AI Can’t Hold Patents, What About Copyright?

 

Reuters reports that the Supreme Court upheld the US Court of prayers ’ decision to determine that only humans can hold patents. A computer scientist named Stephen Thaler created an artificial intelligence program that designed a drink holder prototype.

Thaler applied the AI- designed libation holder for a patent, but the US Patent Office rejected the operation. The computer scientist appealed to the Supreme Court, which rejected the hail, latterly upholding the decision. So, if AI ca n't hold patents or trademarks, what does that mean for brand law? still, can it hold brand?

If AI can’t hold patents, can it hold copyright?

Generative artificial intelligence’s relationship with brand law is uncharted legal waters and presents unique challenges. While there's an argument that generative AI creates unique workshop, one thing mires the debate. Every artificial intelligence needs training on being creations( generally without the creator’s authorization) to produce its own. The heart of the issue lies with the fair use doctrine.

Getty Images, the stock print supplier, sued Stability AI for training its program on 12 million prints from Getty. still, it’s just the morning of the legal battle.

The European Union is working on its own AI copyright laws.

According to The Verge, the EU proposed a new brand law stating AI inventors must intimately expose training material. numerous companies that make artificial intelligence systems skirt brand law by not participating the data sets the AI learns from.

However, it would probably be a considerable blow to generative AI’s claim to brand, If the US adopts a analogous law.

AI-generated art is in question, but what about AI-generated music?

A recent trend of using AI to emulate musicians ’ voices has created another contestation girding the tech. AI voice cloning is formerly each over the internet; still, the pop artist Grimes has a unique take.